I’m going to be real upfront here. I blog about things that I deal with in my life. I’ve blogged about DO NOT STRETCH! I also blogged about Leading to Be Judged. Now, I’m gonna blog about the issues that some people may have with gender specific leadership roles.
Leadership In Theory
October 31, 2012I think a lot of times people see leadership as a hierarchical formation, which poses a big problem. By hierarchical I mean by means of a sort of pyramid form with leaders at the top and followers at the bottom. Although leaders are designated into these positions of authority, it does not necessarily mean that they are more significant than the staff or the people that are subordinate to them. In general, titles separate the authoritative figures from the rest of the group, but it does not mean that they are more significant or important as a whole. A lot of times followers or people that do not have leadership positions have just as much to offer to a team as those in leadership roles do because their mentality is different. As leaders it is our obligation to be able to think from different perspectives and look at situations from angles that we would not necessarily look at. Personally, I feel that everyone on a team or in a organization plays a vital role in making sure that the organization meets its requirements or goals. When people are relegated or marginalized into a specific position simply based on their education or status, it sells the entire organization or team short of what it is capable of. When you have leaders that are open to suggestions on what others have to say as opposed to feeling as if they have to make all of the decisions, I think the operation runs a lot smoother. In addition, I am sure that leaders will find that their job is made a lot easier as more people step up to the plate and exercise their leadership potential.
Remember: ANYONE can be a leader! Leaders come in all shapes, sizes, genders, backgrounds, and viewpoints!
For more info, follow this link! ^^^^^
Thanks for reading!
Tediah Grant
Elected Leaders
October 31, 2012I’ve been wondering about this a lot lately, as it’s especially relevant in this election season…
Are leaders who are elected to their positions supposed to act according to what the people who voted for them believe, or what they themselves believe?
To further flesh that out…
There are leaders who believe that they must represent the people who voted for them, no matter if they themselves do or do not believe the same thing. This is the representation theory of leadership. This means that if the leader changes his or her mind on a certain position after they are elected, and their new view does not coincide with the majority of the people, they are not free to act on this view.
There are other leaders who believe that the people voted for them, for their brains, and ability to make decisions, and that in so doing the people have entrusted themselves to their judgment. This is the trustee style of leadership. This means that if the leader changes his or her mind on a certain position after they are elected, they are free to act in accordance with their new view.
As leaders, ought we to adopt a representation or a trustee approach to leadership? Which is most appropriate for the leaders we will be electing in less than a week?
Peace…Love…Leadership
October 31, 2012So I’m pretty sure everyone has heard the whole “time management” speech as college students and how vital it is to our success. When you think about it, time management really is important, because we are all very busy in various aspects of our lives whether it is in sororities and fraternities, student government, athletics, jobs, classes, and various organizations on campus. It takes a very balanced schedule and hard work ethic to make sure that we are all meeting the deadlines designated by professors and activities we are involved in. Similarly, as leaders time management is vital to our success and reliability within a given team or organization. A lot of times as leaders we may have to meet with a committee or corresponding group and if we are heading that meeting and we do not have our part done, then we are not effective leaders. It is important for us to be prepared for all circumstances and manage our time accordingly. In the case that we are not prepared, we look bad as leaders because in this chain of command we are looked up to. So in order to avoid this circumstance, we should always be one step ahead of the pack! In essence, as leaders we should manage our time so that we can help our team or organization instead of hindering with horrible time management skills. Below I have put some tips for managing your time!
- Know your deadlines! This way they will not sneak up on you
- Find out where you are wasting your time and rearrange it!
- Implement a plan where you will be more effective as a leader
Until next time,
Re’Necia C
Life begins at the end of your comfort zone
October 31, 2012Over the course of the past 10 weeks of having been at Mason, I feel like I have learned more about myself than I did all of high school. Through choosing to attend GMU I chose to do something completely out of my comfort zone and as a result, I’ve learned to push myself to learn both about myself and others in ways I realized I had really never done before. The best way to learn is to challenge yourself and to take risks. When we forget to challenge ourselves we tend to get trapped in repetition and what feels comfortable and not only do we lose sight of progress and can often get extremely complacent. Challenging yourself to be out of your comfort zone is a great way to view life through the perspectives of others and to confront yourself with questions of who you are, who you want to be and why.
Being willing to take risks is a challenge within itself. I feel that most people have this preconceived notion that our leaders today are leaders because they worked to produce this image that they have it all together when in reality it’s the opposite. The point is this, while comfort does provide stability, by taking risks you challenge yourself to go beyond your pre conceived notions and to experience life whole heartedly.
The strongest advocates of social change throughout history all share a commonality of being willing to go beyond the social norms to advocate what they truly believed in. In this same way, this should serve as a challenge to each of us to step out and to not only discover ourselves but what we believe in and to pursue it wholeheartedly.
Extraversion vs. Introversion From a Leadership Standpoint
October 31, 2012Recently I read an article by Ronald E. Riggio (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201210/why-can-t-introverts-be-leaders) about introversion vs. extroversion in leadership. This article talks about the positive correlation between extraversion and leadership. There is also a small correlation between effectiveness of a leader and extraversion. I found this a little bit disheartening, considering the fact that I am quite introverted, but as I read further I regained confidence when the article began to discuss how effective introverts can be as leaders. Some successful introverted leaders have included Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Abraham Lincoln, and Gandhi. These are in fact some of the strongest leaders. What do you think, are extraverts more inclined to be leaders?
This article also talks about what appears to be the “critical factor” of a leader regardless of extraversion or introversion. According to Psychology Today’s research the critical factors are good interpersonal skills. Psychology Today found that when adding in the factor of good interpersonal skills, the extraversion advantage disappears. This article states that, “Good interpersonal skills are critical whether the leader is an extravert or an introvert.”
This article talks about how extraverts sometimes come across as more suitable leaders, because they interact well with others and speak well and just fit the stereotype of a leader better than introverts tend to. Do you agree with this? I think that as long as you have the skills needed to relate well to other people, being extraverted or introverted is irrelevant.
Leadership Remixed
October 31, 2012So, I am sitting in my comfy bed listening to music, trying to combat the usual writer’s block for my blog and then it hits me: why not write about music?!
FEAR
October 30, 2012WHAT ARE YOU MOST AFRAID OF ?
Hello my friends :). Let’s conquer our fears today ! Yay! Whether it’s a physical fear, fear of injury, an emotional fear, fear of feeling certain emotions, or a mental fear, fear of heights, let’s conquer them today ! ^^
Justice System….Is It Really Just?
October 30, 2012“Day after day, year after year, anyone following the US criminal justice system will see the hardest punishments hit the very people who are least able to defend themselves.”
The article above questions the integrity of the US legal system. A man was executed for a crime; however, there was a possibility that he was innocent. Those involved in the case lacked the courage to consider evidence of his innocence after he’d been sentenced for execution.
Something that I feel very passionate about is the so-called “fairness” exerted by the judicial system. We all watch crime shows (i.e. Criminal Minds, Law & Order, CSI) where we are taught that those who commit crimes are horrendous people and should be locked away. But do people actually try to understand the criminal? The United States is known for its motto “innocent until proven guilty,” but does society really think that way?
One thing that I challenge is if prisons are right for all people found guilty of a crime. A lot of the time, a person may have made one bad judgement call that resulted in breaking the law, thus affecting the rest of his/her life negatively. Does this mean we should lock them away with hardened criminals? Or should we as a society try to understand and help? And what about when they are released from incarceration? Will being in prison actually stop someone from committing a crime if they are placed in the same environment upon being released?
From first-hand experience I have learned that “justice” is only for those who can afford it. By that, I mean people in urban areas and/or from low-income families have limited power when it comes to defending themselves. They get stuck with public defense attorneys, who are court-appointed and make little money, so they do little work. Is that fair?
The purpose of me writing this blog post is to get you all to consider looking from a different perspective. (I am not trying to make generalizations of all lawyers, judges, etc., involved in the court system. I do believe that it helps more than it harms. I further believe it harms more than it should.)
Could You Handle the Pressure?
October 30, 2012With Hurricane Sandy now behind us it is time to start picking up the pieces that were left behind in its destruction. While some of us were fortunate enough to treat this storm as an opportunity to dance in the rain, others were left with damage and despair. In the wake of this, we are reminded of what was quite possibly one of the worst natural disasters this generation has ever seen: Hurricane Katrina. Read the rest of this entry »